Welcome

Welcome to my Writing blog. If you're interested in my comments about "My Favorite Things," my articles for yourLDSneighborhood.com, and Life in general, click here. For a direct link to my website, click rondahinrichsen.com.
Showing posts with label Character. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Character. Show all posts

Friday, November 4, 2011

FIVE INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS--BY David Farland


So, I’ve been asked to talk about five things that my novels must have in order for me to feel that they’re successful.  That’s a brilliant question.

1)      Every tale needs an interesting setting, one with unexpected depth and richness, that transports a reader.  Ever look at the fifty bestselling movies ever?  They all take you to another time or another place.  Some of them, like Star Wars, even do both!  The same is true of bestselling novels.

2)      My story needs characters that people care deeply about.  As an audience member, I don’t necessarily need to “fall in love” with a character, but I must be able to empathize, put myself in his or her place.

3)      Each story I write needs characters who act on their impulses.  By that I mean, my characters can’t sit around and just think about saying and doing the right things, they have to confront any problem thrown at them.  They have to go out and change their worlds.

4)      My story must have fascinating twists.  As an author you have to constantly be thinking, “I know what other authors have done with stories like this, but where else could this go?” Then you have to take the reader there.  You want your novel to be novel, unique, unlike any other.

5)      Ultimately, each story needs to make the audience see the world in new ways.  When my reader closes a book, I want them to realize that no matter what harrowing things I’ve put them through in fiction, they feel wiser, energized, and more capable of handling whatever it is that life throws at them.

See David Farland's new Writing Tips blog at www.davidfarland.com
Find out about his new book at www.nightingalebook.com

Friday, February 18, 2011

Tristi Pinkston: A Note on Developing Characterization

I'm fortunate to have Tristi Pinkston here today. I first met her at a Storymaker's writers' conference. She taught a class on voice, but one of the things I remember most about her presentation was her emphasis on our individuality. Like I've mentioned before, part of our value as writers is our individuality, and I loved hearing that conviction in her, too.

But today, she's promised to tell us a little bit about herself and about how she has developed her skills in characterization. 


Dearly Departed - Now Available!
Welcome, Tristi! Please tell us about your latest book. Who is your publisher?

My latest book is titled "Dearly Departed," and it's the sequel to "Secret Sisters." It came out just this last January, and I published it through Walnut Springs. In this installment, Ida Mae infiltrates a nursing home to investigate a suspicious death. Oh, and she gets her very own motorized wheelchair, too, which is awesome.





How long have you wanted to be a writer?

I honestly do not remember a time in my life when I didn't want to be a writer. Some of my earliest memories are of writing little stories in very bad handwriting.

What genres do you write in?

I started out in historical fiction, which I love and always will love and will go back to writing someday, but for right now, I'm focusing on cozy mysteries. I'm having so much fun with them, and it's a completely different world from history. I've needed to get my brain humming along a new track, and this has been great for me.

What is your favorite book or who is your favorite author?

You do realize this is the most difficult question to answer, right? Well, it is! I would have to say that "I Capture the Castle" by Dodie Smith is one of my very favorites, as is "Peace Like a River" by Leif Enger. I love Ann Rinaldi, Dee Henderson, Terri Blackstock, L.M. Montgomery, Louisa May Alcott, Catherine Marshall, Juliet Marillier ... um ... how long is your blog? I could go on ...


My blog is about writing, so to help my readers, what is one writing skill you consider to be your best, and how did you develop it?

I think I'm pretty good at characterization, and I'd say I developed that by reading books that demonstrated it and by watching movies to observe the character's cues. By watching people and taking note of what they do and how they do it, you can strengthen the characterization in your writing.

Please share your favorite something with us. Something like a favorite recipe, activity, childhood memory, game, etc.

I'll share several favorites!
Favorite beverage: ice water
Favorite colors: mauve, burgundy, country blue, sage green, plum
Favorite childhood memories: visiting my grandparents, playing with my pet rabbits, making my own Barbie clothes (I was actually quite talented) reading Heidi and Alice in Wonderland over and over again.

Thank you so much for sharing a bit of yourself with us today, Tristi. We really appreciate it. :)

Monday, September 27, 2010

Donna Hatch's Queen in Exile: What She Did Right--Characterization

I am currently writing a new novel, but I am also trying to increase my ability to create sympathetic characters, or in other words, characters that readers can relate to. In doing this, I've studied not only effective techniques, but I've also watched for those techniques in other writers' novels. One of those novels is Donna Hatch's Queen in Exile. First, from the back cover:
Queen in Exile

Rumors of war hang over Princess Jeniah's peaceful country of Arden, a land that shuns both magic and warfare. Following a lifelong dream, Jeniah forms a telpathic bond with a revered creature called a chayim, who is prophesied to save her kingdom. But when a Darborian knight comes upon Jeniah with her chayim, he sees only a vicious monster about to devour a maiden, and he slays the beast.


Devastated by the loss of her chayim, and fearing that her own magic is evil, Jeniah doubts her destiny. When an enemy invades Arden City, they slaughter the people, storm the castle, and execute the entire royal family except the princess. Rescued by the knight who slew her chayim, Jeniah is now heir to the throne of Arden and the only hope for freeing her people from tyranny.


On the run and hunted by enemy soldiers, Jeniah must place her life and the fate of her kingdom in the hands of this trained killer. Torn between embracing her destiny as queen of Arden, and her love for a mere knight, she must ultimately rely on her magic to save herself and her people from death and tyranny.

Two of the most basic techniques authors use to create characters that readers can identify with are 1) to show the character "petting the dog" and 2) to give them a tragic situation readers can sympathize with. While these are basic methods, authors must find a way to make them feel unique to their stories. Donna Hatch not only did this very well, but she also included them in the first few chapters of her novel.

First, her character reveals her kindness by petting the dog, or in this case, a  magical and rare beast called a chayim. In Donna's own words:

"Jeniah continued to extend her hand until it finally touched the long, square muzzle, finding the golden fur softer than she expected. the chayim closed his mouth and uttered a noise much like a purr."

See? She simply petted the animal, and yet since this is a romantic fantasy, Hatch used a fascinating animal and a unique, legendary situation to make it memorable.

Second, the tragic situation. In Harry Potter, we find Harry orphaned and living in a cupboard with his neglectful aunt and uncle. In my latest novel, Trapped, Emi is a sheltered young woman whose father "died" when she was a baby and whose mother keeps such a tight hold on her that she hardly has her own life. In Queen in Exile, after the romantic lead kills Jeniah's chayim, Jeniah finds herself caught up in a world of war and betrayal in which her entire family is killed and she is captured. All tragic situations? Yes. And as readers, we yearn to see the characters' wrongs righted and their lives restored to a  happily ever after.

Overall, Queen in Exile is an intriguing story, but Hatch's characters . . . well, lets just say it's been several months since I read this book (which I received from the publisher), and yet I still remember Jeniah. And her knight. :)

Thursday, May 13, 2010

IMPRINTS--What She Did Right and Must Have #3: Humanity

I just finished reading Rachel Ann Nunes's latest novel, IMPRINTS, and since Nunes did such a great job with characterization, I thought I would combine "What She Did Right" with a new update to my list of "Must Haves". Gary Provost titled this Must Have as "Humanity" in his "Seven Beacons of Excellent Writing," but I simply refer to it as people.

"Humanity" or "people" means that if you're writing an article or other piece of nonfiction, infuse your information with personal stories about people. Human nature--a reader's nature--is to be interested in other people, their lives, their stories, and especially their CONFLICTS, so using bits of human drama in your writing will draw your readers into your topic.

The same works with fiction. Think about it. While plot points and story events definitely play a roll in catching a reader's attention, it is the character, herself, that captures a reader's heart. It's part of what makes readers love a story; and Rachel Nunes, as I said before, created such a unique, sympathetic character in Autumn, that I just had to use her as an example.

First, Autumn is memorable because she's much of what most of us are not: a barefoot-only, health-food fanatic who was raised by hippies. BUT, the most important parts of Autumn--her caring for others, her personal and spiritual gifts, and her desire to make a difference in this world--are characteristics we can all connect with. All of that, along with Autumn's story, makes her a great character I won't soon forget. More than that, Autumn has given me a new perspective into the hearts of people who seem so different than I am, helping me to pause just a moment longer before I judge another based on their appearance. Thank you, Rachel. Well done!

Friday, September 11, 2009

Character Building-An Interview with Joyce DiPastena on her novel, Illuminations of the Heart




In his book, "Characters & Viewpoint," Orson Scott Card teaches that one way writers can develop their major characters so they're "interesting and believable enough for people to want to read about what they do" is to interrogate them. Yes, that interrogation includes such questions as height, weight, hair color, and family history, but it also incorporates the more important, causal questions that define motive, such as "Why would he do such a thing? What made him do it? If he does it, what will happen as result?" In fact, one bit of advice I learned from an established author was our characters can do anything, as long as we give them the proper motivation.


Author Joyce DiPastena obviously understands this process, for her characters in her recently released, medieval romance, "Illuminations of the Heart" are fully "rounded" and maintain clear motivations.

Take, for instance, Siri, her heroine. Better yet, let's get a stronger feel for the character development process by briefly interrogating both Siri and her creator, Joyce DiPastena.

Ronda: Welcome Joyce, Siri, to The Write Blocks.

Joyce: We're happy to be here. Thanks for inviting us .

Ronda: It's my pleasure. Joyce, why don't we start with you. You must have known, early on in your development of "Illuminations of the Heart" you wanted to write an off-shoot of “Loyalty’s Web.” What led you to find/choose your main character, Siri?

Joyce: I knew I wanted to write an off-shoot of “Loyalty’s Web” when I reached the very end of the book, but I didn’t do it because I wanted to write a book about Siri. I didn’t even know Siri yet! What I wanted to do was write a book about Triston. I hadn’t intended to fall in love with him when I first “created” him for “Loyalty’s Web,” but ultimately that’s exactly what I did. And then I left him so unhappy at the end of that book. And I didn’t foresee any way that he could ever become fully happy given the situation I’d left him in. So the only thing I could think of was to write him a book of his own, knowing there’d have to be some major shakeups between the end of “Loyalty’s Web” and the beginning of what became “Illuminations of the Heart.”

Between the events of “Loyalty’s Web” and what happened during the interim between the two books, Triston carried some deep emotional wounds. There needed to be some kind of agent that would allow him to heal, and that agent became Siri. She needed to be a strong, bright, cheerful, optimistic figure to help “illuminate” the darkness that had become Triston’s life. And she needed the capacity to both teach and impart the lesson of forgiveness. By the way, something in your question just struck me as interesting. You called Siri my “main character”, and a few other interviewers have done the same thing. But once I get a story going, I never consider one character, whether my hero or heroine, to be my “main” one. Ultimately, I always think of my books as stories about a couple. “Loyalty’s Web” was HelĂ©ne and Gunthar’s story. “Illuminations of the Heart” was Siri and Triston’s story. In my mind, each of my stories is equally about the hero and heroine. So while we may be focusing on Siri for this interview, the story was very much “about” Triston, too.

Ronda: Did you base Siri or any of your other fictional characters off of real people you know? If so, who?

Joyce: I never consciously base any of my characters on real people (who knows what my subconscious might be doing?), with one exception. When Siri describes her lack of embroidery talent in “Illuminations of the Heart,” that was based on me.

Ronda: What are you most proud of Siri for doing and why?

Joyce: Teaching Triston to forgive others, and to forgive himself.

Ronda: I agree. Actually, that motivation was one of my favorite things about you, Siri. Why don't you tell us a bit more about yourself? Where were you born? What are your interests? What was your relationship with your family like?

Siri: I was born in the beautiful city of Venice into a warm and loving family. My mother was the daughter of an Italian merchant. Venice was a great trading city, you know, and as it is located on the coast of the Adriatic sea, many pilgrims and crusaders wishing to travel to Jerusalem were required to pass through our city. My father was not engaged in the prosperous maritime trade (though my first husband was). He was an illuminator of considerable reputation. Many of the pilgrims commissioned my father and his apprentices to create beautiful psalteries and prayer books for them to carry with them on their pilgrimages, so my family never wanted for money or comfort.

He was not a native Venetian, though. He, too, had begun as a pilgrim traveling through our city from a far off land to the west called Poitou, but he met and fell in love with my mother and married her, choosing to settle and build up his illumination workshop in Venice rather than proceed on his pilgrimage. I was very close to both my parents. My mother tried diligently to teach me the feminine art of embroidery. But the tedious stitching bored me to tears, and my designs always came out crooked. I wished to learn to paint lovely miniatures like Papa did in his workshop, instead! Papa apprenticed my brother, Simon, to him, but he taught me his art in private, because I was a girl. Still, I do believe I became quite as skilled as Simon was in the end.

After Mama and Papa died, Simon sometimes allowed me to sit in the workshop and help on important commissions. He said he was spoiling me by giving into my pleas to work alongside the employees he had inherited from Papa, but I mastered just the right pout to make him let me have my way. I was very young then, though. I do very little pouting now…at least, not on purpose. Triston accuses me of pouting sometimes, but then he laughs and says it is because of the shape of my lips, and I cannot help that, can I? Do you mind if I ask… What is that very odd object you are…well, I’m not sure exactly what you’re doing with it. Your fingers seem to be flying over some sort of board and then odd little characters appear on that flat background that has an odd glow. Some of the sillier servants at Vere Castle might think you are practicing some sort of witchcraft, but I suspect it is simply some sort of object I do not understand. (Lucianna says I am too curious, but she’s not here just now to scold me, and how will I know if I don’t ask?)

Ronda: Exactly! Which is why I, too, am asking you and Joyce so many questions. Just like my--this object is called a computer--seems so foreign and yet even more interesting to you, so, too, does your life seem interesting and foreign to us. In fact, why do you leave your home, with only your friend and a few body guards as protection, to wind up in Triston’s care? Did you leave any friends or family behind?

Siri: This is still somewhat painful to talk about. My brother and first husband both died. My husband was an old man and though I grieved for him, his death was not unexpected. But poor Simon…he was only seven-and-twenty years. A fever took him, as it had both my parents many years earlier. My first husband left me enough wealth that I might have remained in Venice if I’d wished to. But there was an incident…I’d rather not speak of it just now, it was terrifying and I do fear it may have worsened Simon’s fever, forcing him to expend what little strength he had left. Oh, forgive me. I should be past weeping about this by now. Grant me a moment to compose myself… There, that is better. I do so hate to weep in front of strangers. Simon made up his mind that it would not be safe for me to remain in Venice alone. My mother’s brother had sold my grandparents’ business to take up the religious life. Mama said he had never been hard headed enough to succeed as a merchant anyway. So I had no other family but Simon. When he realized he would not recover from his illness, he drew up a will that sold our illuminator shop and dictated that I should use the proceeds to journey to Papa’s homeland in Poitou. Simon had a friend there whom he’d met on a pilgrimage he’d made while I was married to Alessandro. He said he’d grown to trust this man above all other men he had ever known. He said this man would know how to protect me, and I would have promised Simon anything to give his mind ease while he was so ill. So I gave him my word I would obey his wishes when he was gone.

Yes, I left a few friends behind, but none to whom I was deeply attached, except for my mother’s dear friend, Lucianna. She agreed to travel with me to Poitou, and while she can be a bit haughty and trying at times, she remains my dearest friend!

Ronda: What did you expect would happen to you once you arrived at Triston’s?

Siri: Certainly not what did! Naturally, I was very nervous of my reception. I knew Simon had not had time to send word to Triston ahead of time of my coming. I expected him to be surprised. (That may be too mild a word.) But Simon had spoken so warmly of their friendship and with such confidence in his friend’s honor, that I never doubted I should be safe in his guardianship. But what he thought and said and did when he saw me—! Well, certainly nothing could have prepared me for that!

Ronda: Given the political and familial expectations for women in medieval history, what makes you think you can control your destiny?

Siri: Medieval? Is that what you call the time I live in? What an odd word. What does it mean, please?
Ronda: I'm sorry. It just refers to the time you live in.
Siri: Oh, dear, was that Luciana swishing past the doorway? Do you think she’s eavesdropping on us? I’ll be in for a fine scold when we’re done if I keep quizzing you like this. But I do wonder so about curious things! As to your question, you must remember that my parents were not nobles and held no land, which is all that kings and counts and barons care about when marrying their daughters off. And Simon may have been right. I may have been a bit spoiled when I was younger. I married Alessandro without his permission. When Alessandro died, Simon never tried to force me to marry another man. He knew how I would have fought him, and I know he loved me too much to ever wish me to be unhappy. Simon let me have my way about so many things, like sitting in the workshop, that I suppose I simply assumed I could go on in Poitou much as I had in Venice.

Ronda: You are a beautiful, young widow, though, Siri, and it seems you live in such a rough world, so why don’t you wish to remarry?

Siri: It was not that I did not wish to marry again. It is only that I had married Alessandro for convience’s sake, kind though he was and as fond of him as I grew. But I wished for more than fondness and convenience in a second marriage. This time, I longed for a man I could love with all my heart, and who would love me in return. I did not think that too much to ask. Did you not wish to marry for love yourself, Mistress Ronda?

Ronda: Yes, I did. And I do love my husband, but even so, you quickly learned to love Triston. What do you most love about him?

Siri: Oh, my. Must I be so shallow as to admit that his devastating good looks swept my senses away the moment I laid eyes on him? And I cannot deny that that first kiss from him shook me straight to my core. It was so sweet and gentle, so very unlike… Well, let us not speak of that. But of course, I do not love him only for his kisses. I have never met a man more loyal, more honorable, more earnest to be a good father and faithful husband. He is a skillful knight and few men can stand against the strength of his arm. But he does not enjoy bloodshed and war. I suspect he would rarely leave his beloved Vere Castle if duty and Duke Richard did not call him away. We would both choose a quiet life if we could. I like it when he reads to me while I’m painting miniatures in the books his friends or neighbors often commission from me. I can tell from the volumes he chooses that he wishes his father had allowed him to learn to do more than read simple French. Can you imagine? He once read me part of a book called Dialectica, written by Peter Abelard! Even though the volume had been translated into French, we neither one of us understood the half of what Abelard was saying. But I could tell that Triston wished he did. Oh dear, you asked me to name only one thing about him that I love. But tell me truthfully, Mistress Ronda, is it not the composite of the man that makes you love your husband?

Ronda: YES! I love him both for who he is and what he does. Thank you so much, Siri and Joyce, for taking the time to talk to us today. Our conversation has been very "illuminating."

And as a quick reminder to our audience, leave a comment on this and/or the other reviews taking place on DiPastena's blog tour, and your name (one chance for each comment you make) will be entered in a drawing to win one of four prizes: an autographed copy of "Illuminations of the Heart" or three, online, $10 gift certificates toward the purchase of "Illuminations of the Heart" from Amazon.com, DeseretBook.com, or BarnesandNoble.com.
Happy reading . . . and writing!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Triple Duty Verbs

I recently learned that an author named Ernest Vincent Wright wrote a 50,000 word novel, titled "Gadsby," which never used the letter "e." Not only that, his language flowed beautifully. I know this is kind of an odd way to begin this entry, but I wanted to stress this point: exact words have power. In Wright's case, his goal may have been, in part, to see if he could meet this challenge, but also--I'm guessing--a marketing gimmick--Who wouldn't be curious to see how he had accomplished this feat?--but for my purposes here, I want to emphasize the importance of word choice.


In recent years, I've had editors and an agent describe my writing as "tight," "subtle," "wordsmithing," and "saying a lot in a small amount of space." On first glance, you may say, "those descriptions are redundant," and my response would be, "Yes they are!" Which is exactly my point, because they all describe my detailed use of "word choice." Perhaps I learned this skill through my magazine writing experience. Or maybe it was my poetry training. But either way, I've learned to take great care (it's almost automatic with me now) in choosing words, especially verbs, that will do double or even triple duty.

My first step is to imagine exactly what is going on in the scene and write it using "active" rather than "passive" voice.

Second (either during the creation process or on a later draft), I delete/avoid "ly" words (adverbs) as much as possible and implement verbs that convey that "ly" meaning (double duty). For example, if my character "runs quickly" into a forest out of fear, I might consider "hurtled," "charged," or "tore." On the other hand, if she "runs quickly" out of joy, I might look at"lilted," "raced," or "loped."

Finally, I narrow my verb choices down to one or two "common" ones by deciding which verb actually "fits" the character (triple duty). For instance, Anne Shirley could readily "charge" into a forest out of fear, whereas Sandra Bullock's character in Miss Congeniality would probably "hurtle" or "trip" or even "crash" into the forest. Get the idea?

Now one final thought. I struggle with absolutes. I've always blamed that on the writer in me that believes nothing is absolute (except the gospel, God, etc.), and so I hesitate to guarantee the success of anything. But in this case, I have no hesitation. If you change your verbs from passive to active voice, eliminate most, if not all, of your adverbs, and choose verbs which depict both the action and the character, your prose WILL be stronger. I promise.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

We Have a Winner!

Thanks to all of you who entered my YOUNG WRITERS CONTEST. I loved reading your ideas. There is definitely a lot of talent out there. I did, however, have to choose a winner, and it was Lecia, age 17. One of the things I liked best about her entry was how she related her character's personality, likes, dislikes, and fears to her world in such a personal and detailed way. For instance, her character was queen of the Fire Element and she feared "being contained and being forced into captivity of another person. . . trying to control fire is against nature because nature sent fire to be free."


Congratulations, Lecia!

Monday, August 4, 2008

What J. Scott Savage Did Right: "Farworld"

Among all the writing rules and guidelines a writer, especially a children’s book writer, must keep in mind while she’s crafting her story is “Don’t Be Boring!” J. Scott Savage, author of the soon to be released, children’s fantasy, Farworld, has mastered this skill to a tee. Or a wand. Or in Farworld’s case, a wheelchair.

As I mentioned in my last blog, Young Writer’s Contest, one of Farworld’s main characters is uniquely disabled, a characteristic I’ve rarely seen in such a demanding role. I believe this is due, in part, because readers not only need to relate to the lead, but more often than not, they also want to be like him. Yet WHO would want to be like a disabled boy? No one, I’d guess, unless that boy was also a magically talented, hero-in-the-making boy from another world.

Unique characters are only some of the tools Savage uses to keep young readers turning his pages. Others are distinctive plots and twisted surprises. Which is why I’ve “twisted” my blog today by inviting all of you to climb aboard one of my talking, white horses




and follow me into Oz

There we will meet the Great Wizard of Farworld
and learn a little bit about how he keeps his readers reading.


Why Oz, you ask? Let’s just say, as you’ll soon find out, it has something to do with . . . . . . .
So, let's get started.

Thank you for visiting with us today, Mr. Savage. It's not often that we "Ozzies" get the chance to meet someone who's so magical with his pen.
Glad to be here.
In a past blog, I discussed your talent for “twisting” plots, and when I asked my teenaged daughter what one thing she really liked about Farworld, she indicated it was your unique plot and the interconnection between two worlds. With those ideas in mind, can you tell us how you come up with your plots, and how, specifically, you “twist” them?

I’m currently rereading a series I first read back in high school, (You know when covered wagons used to pick us up.) In it, there is a girl who collects rocks and makes art out of them. The protagonist assumes she thinks of a form then looks for rocks to make that form. But she tells him that the rocks dictate what the form will be. A lot of times we decide as writers what the form will be instead of looking to see what the story wants. For me, the best way to see what the story wants is to take the basic plot I started with and ask what if questions. What if this isn’t what it seems? What if his motive was not the obvious? The more what if questions you ask, especially of what you consider to be the supporting beams of your story, the easier it becomes to take different paths than the reader might expect. Often the first plot you come up with is the one the reader will come up with as well, so give yourself some time to discover the true nature of your story.
I attended one of your classes at an LDStorymakers conference a couple of years ago. There, you said when you ask people to read your manuscripts, you also ask them to mark the page in red whenever they get bored. When you get that manuscript back, what, specifically, do you do to make the scene/page more exciting?
Cry a lot and stamp my feet.

Then, when I’m ready to look at the problem objectively, I ask myself a couple of questions.

1) Is this scene really necessary? Often I find that boring sections shouldn’t even be there in the first place. We put them in as filler, connections, set-ups, whatever. The easiest fix is to just take it out if you can.
2) If the information is important enough that you can’t remove it, consider adding a conflict that may not be key to the story, but which will add excitement to the scene. Let’s take an example right from Farworld. I need to have Marcus and Kyja get money for the bus. I know the trill stones will turn to gem stones, but I have to sell them. I could skip the scene entirely and just tell the reader they sold the stones at a pawn shop. But that’s a copout. The reader will ask how a couple of young kids manage to sell a gem without raising suspicion. But by adding the conflict of the corrupt pawn shop owner, I make the scene not only accurate, but even exciting. I also give Kyja another chance to show what she is made of.
3) If I can’t do 1 or 2, can I integrate it into another more interesting scene? Maybe move it up or back a chapter. Or throw in something funny. Exciting doesn’t have to be tense, it can be a spot of relief. Or change things up. Instead of a wise old, male, tree, make Olden a crabby little old woman that is not much more than a bush—but still very wise.
4) If you get to this point, go back to 1. Suck up you pride of ownership and cut, cut, cut. You’ll feel better afterward.

As I’ve said, creative plots are definitely your forte, and after reading this book, I see you also have a talent with unique characters. For instance, I’ve seen very few books which include a disabled, main character. Why, then, did you choose to include some well-known characters—especially to those of us here in Oz—like a wizard and feisty, talking apple trees?
First let me just say that Master Therapass is not all what he seems on first glance. At the same time, there are a lot of well known characters in the story: the wise wizard, the funny sidekick, the dark wizards. I think you can go one of three directions in fantasy. You can go straight classical fantasy (elves, dwarves, dragons) and just rely on a great twist in the plot. Hard core fantasy buffs will love you, but you’ll get a lot of the “Tolkien rip-off” comments too. Brooks is a great example of a writer who has succeeded at this. You can completely turn everything topsy turvy and create a world where nothing is familiar. This is a lot of fun too. I love discovering everything from scratch. Or you can combine the two. Give enough classical elements (quest, outcast, obstacles, magic) that the reader is able to find place in your story fairly quickly. But then throw in creatures, places, and magical aspects that don’t fit the norm. The reader still may think, “Hmmm this is starting of very much like other stories.” But by the time they get past that, the path diverges enough that they get lost in the story.

It’s not going to work for everyone. You’ll have people that don’t like your spin on magic for example. Or are put off by a hero with disabilities. Or you’ll have people that say, “Boy with a strange mark, magical world, wizard. Must be a Harry Potter remake.” But if the story is good enough, most people will forget about comparisons and get lost in the magic or your world.

Wow. It's been so great to have you here today. Thank you for your insight.

Okay, kids, it's the last day for the Young Writer's Contest. If you haven't yet submitted your entry, now's your chance. Now that you've heard from the author, I can't wait to see what you can do with his oh-so-twisted world!